When I read various people's views about structured blogging then I came to know that Some people call Upper Case Semantics (use of XML) as Structured Blogging and Lower case Semantics (use of XHTML) as microformats . There are some views about other bloggers:
Stowe Boyd explains:
My bet is that Structured Blogging will fail, not because people wouldn't like some of the consequences -- such as an easy way to compare blog posts about concrete things like record reviews, and so on -- but because of the inherent, and wonderful messiness of the world of blogging. and more.
His Microformats v Structured Blogging: A Small War With Big Consequences is also a good explanation of his ideas.
Bob Wyman defines structure blogging as: I've been pleased to see that the relaunch of Structured Blogging has been almost universally well received. However, I'm very puzzled by a number of folk who seem to be trying to find some kind of competition between Structured Blogging and "microformats." The reality is that Structured Blogging is a thing you do and is independent of formats. On the other hand, "microformats" is, as it's name implies, simply one of many approachs to defining the under-the-covers formats that are used by people who are doing Structured Blogging. The two concepts are orthogonal. They don't compete. They can't compete. Verbs don't compete with nouns.
According to my point of view, as I am not much familiar with all these issues, I suggest to use both technologies (structure blogging as well as microformats) in the microcontent publishing so that we can use the benefits of both technologies. But before using structured blogging the unique tags (uniquely identified in www) must be there so that mess between them will not occur.
No comments:
Post a Comment